Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tanner-Klaas v. Garza, 2:18-CV-01626-TLN-AC PS. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180927799 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT RODOLFO L. GARZA; [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT RODOLFO L. GARZA Plaintiff Eva Tanner-Klaas ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Rodolfo L. Garza hereby stipulate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) that this action be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims and causes of action brought against Rodolfo L. Garza, with Plaintiff and Rodolfo L. Garza each bearing their own attorney
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT RODOLFO L. GARZA; [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT RODOLFO L. GARZA

Plaintiff Eva Tanner-Klaas ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Rodolfo L. Garza hereby stipulate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) that this action be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims and causes of action brought against Rodolfo L. Garza, with Plaintiff and Rodolfo L. Garza each bearing their own attorney's fees and costs.

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT RODOLFO L. GARZA

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT RODOLFO L. GARZA. Both Plaintiff and Defendant Rodolfo L. Garza are to bear their own attorney's fees and costs.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer