Sessoms v. Keller, 2:17-cv-0304-JAM-EFB P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180928b86
Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 19, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 19, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations w..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 19, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 19, 2018, are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Winfield, Woods, and the City of Sacramento are dismissed without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
