U.S. v. Mendoza, 1:18 CR 00010 LJO SKO. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181002f47
Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , District Judge . Notice is hereby given, subject to approval by the Court, that Defendant RAMON INZUNZA MENDOZA requests that Mr. John P. Ryan be relieved as attorney of record and, in his place, requests that the Court allow Mary Ann F. Bird, Attorney at Law, to substitute in as the attorney of record as retained counsel. I consent to the above substitution. Datge: September 14, 2018 ___/s/Ramon Inzunza M
Summary: SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , District Judge . Notice is hereby given, subject to approval by the Court, that Defendant RAMON INZUNZA MENDOZA requests that Mr. John P. Ryan be relieved as attorney of record and, in his place, requests that the Court allow Mary Ann F. Bird, Attorney at Law, to substitute in as the attorney of record as retained counsel. I consent to the above substitution. Datge: September 14, 2018 ___/s/Ramon Inzunza Me..
More
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; ORDER
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.
Notice is hereby given, subject to approval by the Court, that Defendant RAMON INZUNZA MENDOZA requests that Mr. John P. Ryan be relieved as attorney of record and, in his place, requests that the Court allow Mary Ann F. Bird, Attorney at Law, to substitute in as the attorney of record as retained counsel.
I consent to the above substitution.
Datge: September 14, 2018 ___/s/Ramon Inzunza Mendoza___
Defendant Ramon Inzunza Mendoza
I consent to the above substitution.
Dated: September 14, 2018. _____/s/Mary Ann F. Bird_______
MARY ANN F. BIRD
Attorney at Law
I consent to the above substitution.
Dated: September 14, 2018. ___ /s/John P. Ryan_________
John P. Ryan
Attorney at Law
FINDINGS AND ORDERS
There exists a trial date of January 23, 2019. Without a representation by counsel that substitution of counsel will not disrupt that date, the motion will not be granted. Therefore, based on the state of the request, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
