Saeteurn v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-0538-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181004e01
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER DISCHARGING THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DATED SEPTEMBER 7, 2018 (Doc. 9) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Previously, the Court ordered Defendant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court's scheduling order. (Doc. 9) In the alternative, Defendant was directed to file and serve the administrative record. ( Id. at 2) Defendant filed a timely response to the Court's order, and has filed the certified administrative record. (Docs. 10, 11
Summary: ORDER DISCHARGING THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DATED SEPTEMBER 7, 2018 (Doc. 9) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Previously, the Court ordered Defendant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court's scheduling order. (Doc. 9) In the alternative, Defendant was directed to file and serve the administrative record. ( Id. at 2) Defendant filed a timely response to the Court's order, and has filed the certified administrative record. (Docs. 10, 11)..
More
ORDER DISCHARGING THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DATED SEPTEMBER 7, 2018
(Doc. 9)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
Previously, the Court ordered Defendant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court's scheduling order. (Doc. 9) In the alternative, Defendant was directed to file and serve the administrative record. (Id. at 2) Defendant filed a timely response to the Court's order, and has filed the certified administrative record. (Docs. 10, 11) Accordingly, the order to show cause dated September 7, 2018 (Doc. 9) is DISCHARGED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
