Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Praylow, 1:18-CR-00064 LJO. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181010a46 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney and Kimberly A. Sanchez, Assistant U.S. Attorney and Nicholas Capozzi, attorney for the defendant, that the hearing on defendant's motion to suppress set for, October 9, 2018, before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, Chief U.S. District Court Judge, be continued to November 5, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. The parties engage
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney and Kimberly A. Sanchez, Assistant U.S. Attorney and Nicholas Capozzi, attorney for the defendant, that the hearing on defendant's motion to suppress set for, October 9, 2018, before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, Chief U.S. District Court Judge, be continued to November 5, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. The parties engaged in plea negotiations resulting in a revised offer being tendered to defense on Wednesday, September 12, 2018. The defendant is housed in Lerdo, which has somewhat delayed the negotiation process. The offer expires when the Government responds to the defendant's pending suppression motion. The defendant requested additional time to consider the offer. The parties believe that they may be able to resolve the case with a plea agreement. However, they need additional time to do so. As such, the parties request that the Government's Response deadline be extended to October 29, 2018 (undersigned counsel is out of state at training from October 17-19), and the hearing be continued to November 5, 2018.

The parties further request the Court to enter an Order finding that the "ends of justice" served by a continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that the delay through November 5, 2018 is excluded from the Act's time limits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer