Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Zaiza v. Guthrie, 1:16-cv-01862-LJO-JLT (PC). (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181010a55 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM (Doc. 33) CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties settled this action on September 5, 2018, during a settlement. (Doc. 40.) All dates, hearings, and conferences have been vacated, and the parties have now filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice. (Doc. 42.) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court
More

ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM (Doc. 33) CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE

The parties settled this action on September 5, 2018, during a settlement. (Doc. 40.) All dates, hearings, and conferences have been vacated, and the parties have now filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice. (Doc. 42.) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 42), it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, The Court thus ORDERS:

1. The September 11, 2018, writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for plaintiff's appearance at the telephonic trial confirmation hearing (Doc. 33) is VACATED; 2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action; 3. The Clerk of Court shall provide via fax or email a copy of this order to the Litigation Coordinator at California State Prison in Corcoran, California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer