Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Quigley v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00938-CKD. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181011977 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/REMAND CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to file a Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended to the new due date of November 7, 2018. This extension (30 days) is requested because the brief writer has had some com
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/REMAND

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to file a Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended to the new due date of November 7, 2018.

This extension (30 days) is requested because the brief writer has had some computer issues which have caused a backlog in her briefing schedule, therefore, the writer needs additional time to file the Motion for Summary Judgment.

ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/REMAND

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties for a requested first extension of Plaintiff's time to file a Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand, the request is hereby APPROVED.

Plaintiff shall file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand on or before November 7, 2018.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer