Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Asmus v. Arjohuntleigh, Inc., 2:18-cv-00488-MCE-DB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181012a25 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this action, by their respective attorneys, its form and content being hereby approved, that the above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement, and have agreed to bear their own attorneys' fees a
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this action, by their respective attorneys, its form and content being hereby approved, that the above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

The parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement, and have agreed to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. The parties to this action request this Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The above-captioned action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. 2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer