Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Oberts v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-00142-GSA. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181016677 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER RESPONSIVE BRIEF GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file her responsive brief. Defendant respectfully requests this extension because the undersigned has a very heavy workload, especially with additional administrative duties fo
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER RESPONSIVE BRIEF

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file her responsive brief. Defendant respectfully requests this extension because the undersigned has a very heavy workload, especially with additional administrative duties for the end of the federal fiscal year.

The new due date for Defendant's responsive brief will be Monday, November 12, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer