U.S. v. Padilla-Acosta, 2:17-CR-0045 TLN. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181016701
Visitors: 37
Filed: Oct. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCING TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Defendant, RAUL PADILLA-ACOSTA, through his attorney ROBERT L. FORKNER, together with the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby stipulate and request the following: 2. Due to transportation issues Probation has not been able to produce the Presentencing Report before the currently scheduled sentencing hearing. A continuance is reques
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCING TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Defendant, RAUL PADILLA-ACOSTA, through his attorney ROBERT L. FORKNER, together with the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby stipulate and request the following: 2. Due to transportation issues Probation has not been able to produce the Presentencing Report before the currently scheduled sentencing hearing. A continuance is request..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCING
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Defendant, RAUL PADILLA-ACOSTA, through his attorney ROBERT L. FORKNER, together with the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby stipulate and request the following:
2. Due to transportation issues Probation has not been able to produce the Presentencing Report before the currently scheduled sentencing hearing. A continuance is requested in order to allow a complete review of the Report from Probation with the defendant, and to file the necessary objections before the currently scheduled date.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
