Palmer v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-0356-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181023819
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 15) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of time to file and serve her opening brief. (Doc. 15) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 15) is GRAN
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 15) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of time to file and serve her opening brief. (Doc. 15) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 15) is GRANT..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 15)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
The parties have stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of time to file and serve her opening brief. (Doc. 15) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 15) is GRANTED; and
2. Plaintiff SHALL file her opening brief on or before November 23, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
