Gstettenbauer v. City of Sacramento, 2:15-CV-00550-TLN-CKD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181024829
Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING ALL DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE (Modified from Submitted Version) TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff CYNTHIA GSTETTENBAUER nee CYNTHIA DE JESUS EDMUNSON and the CITY OF SACRAMENTO by and through their respective attorneys, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request the trial date and corresponding deadlines in this case be continued. Presently, trial in this case is scheduled to begin on July 15, 2019. This fifth request for an extension of tim
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING ALL DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE (Modified from Submitted Version) TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff CYNTHIA GSTETTENBAUER nee CYNTHIA DE JESUS EDMUNSON and the CITY OF SACRAMENTO by and through their respective attorneys, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request the trial date and corresponding deadlines in this case be continued. Presently, trial in this case is scheduled to begin on July 15, 2019. This fifth request for an extension of time..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING ALL DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE
(Modified from Submitted Version)
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff CYNTHIA GSTETTENBAUER nee CYNTHIA DE JESUS EDMUNSON and the CITY OF SACRAMENTO by and through their respective attorneys, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request the trial date and corresponding deadlines in this case be continued. Presently, trial in this case is scheduled to begin on July 15, 2019. This fifth request for an extension of time is based on the following good cause:
1. The parties participated in mediation on October 4, 2018, with the Honorable Raul A. Ramirez, United States District Court Judge (Retired). While settlement was not reached on October 4, 2018, the parties wish to continue engaging in settlement discussions with the assistance of Judge Ramirez.
2. The parties believe the requested deadline extensions are necessary and appropriate given the parties collective desire to settle this matter. The extensions will allow the parties to continue participating in settlement discussions without unnecessary expenditures on costs and attorneys' fees; making the case more likely to settle.
Based on the forgoing, the parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court reset the deadlines as follows:
Expert disclosure: January 9, 2019
Expert rebuttal: February 7, 2019
Hearing of Dispositive Motions: May 2, 2019
Joint Pretrial Conference Statement: July 18, 2019
Final Pretrial Conference: July 25, 2019, at 2:00 PM
Jury Trial: September 23, 2019, at 9:00 AM
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
