Hanks v. Sexton, 1:18-cv-00202-LJO-SKO (HC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181024i13
Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING STATUS OF CASE (Doc. 30) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, Jonathan Hanks, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On October 19, 2018, Petitioner filed a notice entitled "Notice of Respondent's Failure to Inform Petitioner of Respondent's Reply to Petitioner's Opposition Dated August 06, 2018; And Petitioner's Request to Know the Status of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation." (Doc. 30
Summary: ORDER REGARDING STATUS OF CASE (Doc. 30) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, Jonathan Hanks, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On October 19, 2018, Petitioner filed a notice entitled "Notice of Respondent's Failure to Inform Petitioner of Respondent's Reply to Petitioner's Opposition Dated August 06, 2018; And Petitioner's Request to Know the Status of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation." (Doc. 30...
More
ORDER REGARDING STATUS OF CASE (Doc. 30)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner, Jonathan Hanks, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 19, 2018, Petitioner filed a notice entitled "Notice of Respondent's Failure to Inform Petitioner of Respondent's Reply to Petitioner's Opposition Dated August 06, 2018; And Petitioner's Request to Know the Status of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation." (Doc. 30.) Petitioner appears to contend he did not receive Respondent's reply to his opposition.
Respondent filed a timely reply to Petitioner's response on September 17, 2018. (Doc. 28.) Because it appears Petitioner did not receive the reply, Respondent re-served Petitioner on October 22, 2018. (Doc. 31.)
Petitioner further requests a statement of the status of the above-captioned case. The undersigned has taken the petition under submission and will issue findings and recommendations in due course.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
