Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sanchez v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00066-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181024i71 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from October 22, 2018, to November 21, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because S. Wyeth McAda
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from October 22, 2018, to November 21, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because S. Wyeth McAdam, the attorney responsible for drafting any opposition or counter-motion, was unable to complete her opposition because she has three briefs due on October 22, 2018 and needs more time to draft the response and go through the necessary in-house reviews for new attorneys.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Counsel apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this delay.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer