Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nautilus Insurance Company v. La Nueva Estrella, LLC, 1:18-CV-00206-LJO-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181025720 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , District Judge . TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company ("Nautilus"), by and through its attorneys of record Selman Breitman, LLP, Defendant La Nueva Estrella, LLC, by and through their attorneys of record Arthofer & Tonkin, Defendant Jennifer Judith Rivera Nunez, by and through her Guardian ad Litem Diafra Rivera Cruz, by and through her a
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company ("Nautilus"), by and through its attorneys of record Selman Breitman, LLP, Defendant La Nueva Estrella, LLC, by and through their attorneys of record Arthofer & Tonkin, Defendant Jennifer Judith Rivera Nunez, by and through her Guardian ad Litem Diafra Rivera Cruz, by and through her attorney of record the Law Offices of Jake D. Finkel, APC, Defendants Imelda Ramirez Carrillo, Maria Lilia Ramirez Carrillo, Anayeli Perez Ramirez, and Luis Angel Perez Ramirez (on behalf of Fernando Ramirez, deceased, and Petra Carrillo, deceased), by and through their attorneys of record Perez, Williams, Medina & Rodriguez, LLP, Defendants Adelina Campos de Morales, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Jose Morales Bravo, Jose Morales Campos, Eva Marie Tamayo, Ana I. Leyva, and Fernando Morales Campos (on behalf of Jose Morales Bravo, deceased), by and through their attorney of record Shane Law, Defendants Victor Arteaga, Victor Hernandez Santos, Giovanna Vazquez Martinez, Carmelo Gonzales Sanchez, Florina Lopez de Ruiz, and Maria Consuelo Olivares Ochoa, by and through their attorneys of record Law Offices of Brown & Gessell, (all parties are collectively, the "Parties"), hereby enter into the following stipulation to continue the Initial Scheduling Conference in this matter presently set for October 22, 2018.

RECITALS:

WHEREAS Defendant Jennifer Judith Rivera Nunez, by and through her Guardian ad Litem Diafra Rivera Cruz, filed a Complaint on August 22, 2016 in Merced Superior Court, Case No. 16CV-02493, styled Rivera v. Autobuses Coordinados U.S.A., Inc., et. al.

WHEREAS Defendants Imelda Ramirez Carrillo, Maria Lilia Ramirez Carrillo, Anayeli Perez Ramirez and Luis Angel Perez Ramirez (on behalf of Fernando Ramirez, deceased and Petra Carrillo, deceased), filed a Complaint on September 1, 2016 in Merced Superior Court, Case No. 16CV-02569, styled Carrillo, et al. v. Vasquez, et al. Defendants also filed a separate action in Merced Superior Court, Case No. 18CV-03019.

WHEREAS Defendants Adelina Campos de Morales, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Jose Morales Bravo, Jose Morales Campos, Eva Marie Tamayo, Ana I. Leyva, and Fernando Morales Compos (on behalf of Jose Morales Bravo, deceased), filed a Complaint on September 23, 2016 in Merced Superior Court, Case No. 16CV-02876, styled Campos v. Autobuses.

WHEREAS Defendants Victor Arteaga, Victor Hernandez Santos, Giovanna Vazquez Martinez, Carmelo Gonzalez Sanchez, Florina Lopez de Ruiz, and Maria Consuelo Olivares Ochoa, filed a Complaint on October 27, 2016 in Merced Superior Court, Case No. 16CV-03274, styled Artega, et al. v. Vasquez et al.

WHEREAS Nautilus filed a Complaint on February 8, 2018 in United States District Court, Eastern District of California — Fresno Division, Case No. 1:18-CV-00206-LJO-EPG, styled Nautilus Insurance Company v. La Nueva Estrella, LLC, et al.

WHEREAS there is a mediation in the Underlying Action set for November 6, 2018, at which all parties will be present and may resolve this matter.

WHEREAS the parties agree to continue the initial scheduling conference from October 22, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. to January 10, 2019 at 10:30 a.m.

STIPULATION:

Based on the foregoing recitals, the Parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and request that the Court continue the initial scheduling conference in this matter to January 10, 2019, at 10:30 a.m.

I attest that all electronic signatories listed above, and on whose behalf this stipulation is submitted, concur in the stipulation's content and have authorized the filing of this stipulation.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the stipulation of all the parties to this action, the Court finds that good cause exists to approve the stipulation and that the Initial Scheduling Conference in this matter be set for January 10, 2019 at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer