Frances v. Accessible Space, Inc., 2:16-cv-01016-JAM-GGH. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181025863
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff appears in this personal injury action pro se and in forma pauperis. On May 29, 2018 the magistrate judge to whom the matter was assigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that plaintiff's Motion for a Restraining Order should be denied as moot. ECF No. 39. Parties were given fourteen (14) days to file any objections to the foregoing. Id. Plaintiff filed what was denominated as a Response to defendants' Opposition to her Mot
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff appears in this personal injury action pro se and in forma pauperis. On May 29, 2018 the magistrate judge to whom the matter was assigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that plaintiff's Motion for a Restraining Order should be denied as moot. ECF No. 39. Parties were given fourteen (14) days to file any objections to the foregoing. Id. Plaintiff filed what was denominated as a Response to defendants' Opposition to her Moti..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff appears in this personal injury action pro se and in forma pauperis. On May 29, 2018 the magistrate judge to whom the matter was assigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that plaintiff's Motion for a Restraining Order should be denied as moot. ECF No. 39. Parties were given fourteen (14) days to file any objections to the foregoing. Id. Plaintiff filed what was denominated as a Response to defendants' Opposition to her Motion, ECF No. 42, which the court views as objections to the Findings and Recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file and the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations the court ADOPTS the findings and recommendations in full.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for a Restraining Order is DENIED;
2. The Clerk of the Court shall remove the gavel on ECF No. 39 on the court's docket.
Source: Leagle
