Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tule Lake Committee v. City of Tulelake, 2:18-CV-2280-KJM-DMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181025877 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, which is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. A settlement conference was held on September 27, 2018, before the undersigned in Sacramento, California, at which time an interim settlement agreement was reached. Among other things, the parties agreed neither side would disparage the other and the settlement agreement would not be made public. Initially, the Clerk of the Court sealed the proceedings, see Docs. 27 an
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, which is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. A settlement conference was held on September 27, 2018, before the undersigned in Sacramento, California, at which time an interim settlement agreement was reached. Among other things, the parties agreed neither side would disparage the other and the settlement agreement would not be made public. Initially, the Clerk of the Court sealed the proceedings, see Docs. 27 and 29 (September 27, 2018, minutes and amended minutes), but the seal was lifted to allow the parties to obtain transcripts of the settlement as read into the record on September 27, 2018, see Doc. 30 (October 11, 2018, minute order). On October 17, 2018, plaintiff's counsel submitted a stipulated interim settlement agreement with proposed order thereon. See Doc. 31. The stipulated interim settlement agreement and proposed order was not filed under seal. See id.

On the court's own motion, and good cause appearing therefor, the Clerk of the Court is directed to seal the September 27, 2018, proceedings as well as the stipulated interim settlement agreement and proposed order submitted on October 17, 2018. The matter is set for a telephonic status conference before the undersigned in Redding, California, on October 25, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. The parties may arrange appearances through CourtCall. In the meantime, the court expects the parties to honor the terms of the interim settlement agreement reached on September 27, 2018, particularly those terms relating to disparagement of the parties and public disclosure of the interim agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer