Rumantsev v. Berryhill, 2:17-CV-02539-EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181026b02
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to October 25, 2018. This is a second extension but of only two days, the reasons being that plaintiff's counsel's computer and office network were being worked on for
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to October 25, 2018. This is a second extension but of only two days, the reasons being that plaintiff's counsel's computer and office network were being worked on for s..
More
STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to October 25, 2018.
This is a second extension but of only two days, the reasons being that plaintiff's counsel's computer and office network were being worked on for several hours on October 22, and aside from other work, such as a hearing October 23, counsel's schedule on October 24, 2018, is quite full.
ORDER
For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is extended to October 25, 2018.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
