Rosiles v. Pfeiffer, 2:17-cv-02600-KJM-GGH. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181101942
Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus on December 12, 2017, ECF No.1 in pro se, but has failed to complete an application for in forma pauperis status. On October 1, 2018 this court filed Findings and Recommendations recommending that petitioner's petition for a writ be dismissed with prejudice and directed that any objections thereto were to be filed within 21 days after service of the Order. ECF No. 20. On October 24, 2018 pe
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus on December 12, 2017, ECF No.1 in pro se, but has failed to complete an application for in forma pauperis status. On October 1, 2018 this court filed Findings and Recommendations recommending that petitioner's petition for a writ be dismissed with prejudice and directed that any objections thereto were to be filed within 21 days after service of the Order. ECF No. 20. On October 24, 2018 pet..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus on December 12, 2017, ECF No.1 in pro se, but has failed to complete an application for in forma pauperis status. On October 1, 2018 this court filed Findings and Recommendations recommending that petitioner's petition for a writ be dismissed with prejudice and directed that any objections thereto were to be filed within 21 days after service of the Order. ECF No. 20. On October 24, 2018 petitioner filed a motion for a 30 day extension of time to file objections. ECF No. 21.
The court has examined the petitioner's motion and finding good cause therefore HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
1. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to file any objections to the Findings and Recommendations filed on October 1, 2018.
2. Any failure to timely file such objections shall result in no consideration thereof.
3. This Order resolves ECF Nos. 20 and 21.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
