Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Flores, 1:18-cv-01248 LJO JLT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181109i18 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO THE DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On October 24, 2018, the plaintiff filed proof demonstrating the defendant had been served the summons and complaint on October 12, 2018. (Doc. 4) After the defendant failed to respond to the complaint, on November 2, 2018, the plaintiff sought entry of default (Doc. 5) and the Clerk entered default the next day (Doc. 6). The day after that, the defendant filed his answer (Do
More

ORDER TO THE DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN

On October 24, 2018, the plaintiff filed proof demonstrating the defendant had been served the summons and complaint on October 12, 2018. (Doc. 4) After the defendant failed to respond to the complaint, on November 2, 2018, the plaintiff sought entry of default (Doc. 5) and the Clerk entered default the next day (Doc. 6). The day after that, the defendant filed his answer (Doc. 8). Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. Within 14 days, the defendant SHALL show cause in writing why his answer should not be stricken. Alternately, he may file a stipulation or a motion to set aside the default within the same 14-day period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer