Jones v. Meddly, 1:17-cv-00109-SAB (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181109i37
Visitors: 26
Filed: Nov. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 34) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On November 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant's reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 34.) The Court construes this filing as a surreply. No further briefing on Defendant's motion for summary judgment is permitted absent leave of court. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 34) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On November 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant's reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 34.) The Court construes this filing as a surreply. No further briefing on Defendant's motion for summary judgment is permitted absent leave of court. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave t..
More
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(ECF No. 34)
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
On November 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant's reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 34.) The Court construes this filing as a surreply.
No further briefing on Defendant's motion for summary judgment is permitted absent leave of court. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave to file a surreply, and the Court does not desire any further briefing on the motion.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's surreply (ECF No. 34) is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
