Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Daniels v. Valencia, 1:17-cv-00492-DAD-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181113717 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (ECF Nos. 43, 44) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On November 5, 2018, Plaintiff David Daniels, and Defendants J. Valencia, M. Owens, E. Torres, S. Pano, M. Benevidez, C. Crabtree, N. Johnson, E. Madruga, J. Carranza, D. Snell, S. Babb, S. Sherman, and L. Hutchinson filed a stipulation for voluntary dismiss of the entire action with prejudice. (ECF Nos. 43, 44.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismis
More

ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

(ECF Nos. 43, 44)

On November 5, 2018, Plaintiff David Daniels, and Defendants J. Valencia, M. Owens, E. Torres, S. Pano, M. Benevidez, C. Crabtree, N. Johnson, E. Madruga, J. Carranza, D. Snell, S. Babb, S. Sherman, and L. Hutchinson filed a stipulation for voluntary dismiss of the entire action with prejudice. (ECF Nos. 43, 44.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer