Puckett v. Agboli, 2:14-CV-2776-JAM-DMC-P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181113i54
Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On August 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified. No objections to the finding
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On August 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified. No objections to the findings..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.
On August 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge's analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 20, 2018, are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 47) is denied; and
3. The matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Source: Leagle