Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rigsby v. Intercare Speciality Risk Insurance Services, Inc., 2:17-cv-01347-MCE-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181113i73 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER AFTER STATUS CONFERENCE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . This matter came before the Court for status conference on November 1, 2018, at 11:00 a.m., based on the Court's Minute Order of October 22, 2018 at ECF No. 130, which required the personal appearance of all parties including defendant Kevin Hamm, in pro se. Robert Riggs appeared for the Plaintiffs, Karen Rigsby and Donald Steinmeyer. Proof was made that the Court's Minute Order was served by the Clerk on defendant Ke
More

ORDER AFTER STATUS CONFERENCE

This matter came before the Court for status conference on November 1, 2018, at 11:00 a.m., based on the Court's Minute Order of October 22, 2018 at ECF No. 130, which required the personal appearance of all parties including defendant Kevin Hamm, in pro se. Robert Riggs appeared for the Plaintiffs, Karen Rigsby and Donald Steinmeyer. Proof was made that the Court's Minute Order was served by the Clerk on defendant Kevin Hamm at his address of record, c/o ISR Holdings, Inc., 140 Diamond Creek Place, Roseville, CA 95747. Defendant Kevin Hamm did not appear. Defendants ISR Holdings, Inc., formerly named Intercare Specialty Risk Insurance Services, Inc., and Phoenix Risk Management, Inc. did not appear.

The Court, in its order entered herein July 3, 2018, has previously cautioned defendants ISR Holdings, Inc. and Phoenix Risk Management, Inc. that they cannot make any further appearance in this matter without counsel appearing on their behalf. Despite this warning, defendants ISR Holdings, Inc. and Phoenix Risk Management, Inc., have not appeared through counsel for four months. Entry of the default of these defendants, due to their failure to appear in this action despite the Court's warning, is proper at this time. Employee Painters' Trust v. Ethan Enterprises, Inc., 480 F.3d 993, 998 (9th Cir. 2007); Board of Trustees of IBEW Local Union No. 100 Pension Trust Fund v. Porges, 2013 WL 4012009, *4 [2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110643] (E.D. Cal. 2013).

Additionally, the dismissal of the Counterclaim of Defendant ISR Holdings, Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule 41(b) is warranted at this time. Such dismissal is warranted here based on (1) the general public interest in expeditious resolution of litigation, (2) this Court's need to manage its docket, and (3) the prejudice to Plaintiffs from the failure of ISR Holdings, Inc. to appear and prosecute this matter diligently. E.g., Ken-Mac Metals v. Inependent Sheet Metal, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53706 [2011 WL 1937135], at *5-*8 (D. Nev. 2011).

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Default is hereby entered as to Defendants Phoenix Risk Management, Inc. and ISR Holdings, Inc.

2. ISR Holdings, Inc.'s Cross Complaint at ECF No. 34, as amended by its First Amended Counterclaim at ECF No. 111, is hereby dismissed for lack of prosecution.

3. All current hearings and due dates established by the Court's Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order at ECF No. 4, as amended by the Joint Report of the Parties Outlining Discovery Plan and Order Thereon at ECF No. 75, and the Stipulation and Order to Modify Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order and Joint Report of the Parties Outlining Discovery Plan, at ECF No. 104, are hereby vacated.

4. A hearing on Plaintiffs' application for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule 55(b)(2) is hereby set for 11 a.m. on Monday, December 3, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer