Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Storz Management Company v. Carey, 2:18-cv-0068 TLN DB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181114c37 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . This action came before the undersigned on November 9, 2018, for hearing of defendants' motion for a protective order. (ECF No. 44.) Attorneys Andrew Bluth and Christopher Bakes appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs. Attorney James Kachmar appeared on behalf of the defendants. Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendan
More

ORDER

This action came before the undersigned on November 9, 2018, for hearing of defendants' motion for a protective order. (ECF No. 44.) Attorneys Andrew Bluth and Christopher Bakes appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs. Attorney James Kachmar appeared on behalf of the defendants.

Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' October 15, 2018 motion for a protective order (ECF No. 44) is granted;

2. The subpoenaed text messages shall be produced to defendants' counsel1; and

3. Within fourteen days of receipt of the text messages by defendants' counsel, defendants shall produce the text messages and/or, if applicable, a privilege log to plaintiffs.

FootNotes


1. Defendants shall take all reasonable steps to assist in the production of the text messages.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer