Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, 2:18-cv-01694-JAM-DMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181121a81
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and upon the Court's approval, that the dates set forth in the September 25, 2018 Order [ECF No. 14] be extended as follows: Current Proposed — Plaintiff's reply/opposition: Jan. 10, 2019 Jan. 31, 2019 — Defendant's reply Jan. 31, 2019 Feb. 21, 2019 — Cross-Motion
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and upon the Court's approval, that the dates set forth in the September 25, 2018 Order [ECF No. 14] be extended as follows: Current Proposed — Plaintiff's reply/opposition: Jan. 10, 2019 Jan. 31, 2019 — Defendant's reply Jan. 31, 2019 Feb. 21, 2019 — Cross-Motions..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and upon the Court's approval, that the dates set forth in the September 25, 2018 Order [ECF No. 14] be extended as follows:
Current Proposed
— Plaintiff's reply/opposition: Jan. 10, 2019 Jan. 31, 2019
— Defendant's reply Jan. 31, 2019 Feb. 21, 2019
— Cross-Motions Hearing: Mar. 19, 2019 no change
There is good cause to modify the pretrial schedule because undersigned defense counsel was recently confirmed for a ten-day jury trial beginning on January 7, 2019. The filing of the parties' briefs above will not affect the March 19, 2019 hearing date.
ORDER
Finding good cause, the foregoing stipulation between the parties is hereby APPROVED. The deadlines set forth in the September 25, 2018 Order [ECF No. 14] are extended as follows:
— Plaintiff's reply/opposition: Jan. 31, 2019
— Defendant's reply Feb. 21, 2019
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
