Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Brooks v. City of Vallejo, 2:16-cv-02376-WBS-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181128a26 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS THE ENTIRE ACTION WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff JIMMY BROOKS and Defendants JESSE IRVIN, ZACH JACOBSEN, MATT SAMIDA and JAMES DUNCAN (collectively "the Parties") by and through their respective designated counsel that this action be hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party will bear thei
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS THE ENTIRE ACTION

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff JIMMY BROOKS and Defendants JESSE IRVIN, ZACH JACOBSEN, MATT SAMIDA and JAMES DUNCAN (collectively "the Parties") by and through their respective designated counsel that this action be hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1).

Each party will bear their own costs and attorney's fees.

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature ("/s/") within this E-filed document or have been authorized by counsel to show their signature on this document as/s/.

[PROPOSED] ORDER DIMSISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES STIPULATION, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants JESSE IRVIN, ZACH JACOBSEN, MATT SAMIDA and JAMES DUNCAN are dismissed from this action with prejudice and that the entire action is dismissed with prejudice.

Each party is to bear their own attorney's fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer