Presas v. Fussel, 1:13-cv-02038-DAD-SKO (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181203634
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING FILING OF DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS 90-DAY DEADLINE. SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . The parties have filed a Notice of Settlement indicating resolution of all claims in this action. (Doc. 72.) Good cause has been shown to extend the filing of final documents per Local Rule 160(b). However, the Court ORDERS the parties to file the appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety within ninety (90) days. The Court VACATES all pending dates and matter
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING FILING OF DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS 90-DAY DEADLINE. SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . The parties have filed a Notice of Settlement indicating resolution of all claims in this action. (Doc. 72.) Good cause has been shown to extend the filing of final documents per Local Rule 160(b). However, the Court ORDERS the parties to file the appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety within ninety (90) days. The Court VACATES all pending dates and matters..
More
ORDER REQUIRING FILING OF DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS
90-DAY DEADLINE.
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
The parties have filed a Notice of Settlement indicating resolution of all claims in this action. (Doc. 72.) Good cause has been shown to extend the filing of final documents per Local Rule 160(b). However, the Court ORDERS the parties to file the appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety within ninety (90) days. The Court VACATES all pending dates and matters. Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed any such violation. See Local Rule 160 and Local Rule 272.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
