Reese v. County of Sacramento, 2:13-cv-00559-WBS-DB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181210a44
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff ROBERT I. REESE, JR., by and through his undersigned counsel, and all Defendants by and through their undersigned counsel, that all claims by Plaintiff ROBERT I. REESE, JR. alleged against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the case ha
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff ROBERT I. REESE, JR., by and through his undersigned counsel, and all Defendants by and through their undersigned counsel, that all claims by Plaintiff ROBERT I. REESE, JR. alleged against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the case has..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff ROBERT I. REESE, JR., by and through his undersigned counsel, and all Defendants by and through their undersigned counsel, that all claims by Plaintiff ROBERT I. REESE, JR. alleged against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the case has been settled in full pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement between the parties.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
