Vogt v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company, 1:17-cv-01580 LJO JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181212945
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE (Doc. 16) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Despite the requirements of law and the Court's scheduling order (Doc. 7 at 7), the parties seek amendments to the case schedule without demonstrating good cause. Their mere conclusion that the "interests of justice" would be served by the amendments is insufficient. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 , 610 (9th Cir. 1992). Therefore, the stipulation is DENIED. IT
Summary: ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE (Doc. 16) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Despite the requirements of law and the Court's scheduling order (Doc. 7 at 7), the parties seek amendments to the case schedule without demonstrating good cause. Their mere conclusion that the "interests of justice" would be served by the amendments is insufficient. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 , 610 (9th Cir. 1992). Therefore, the stipulation is DENIED. IT I..
More
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE
(Doc. 16)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
Despite the requirements of law and the Court's scheduling order (Doc. 7 at 7), the parties seek amendments to the case schedule without demonstrating good cause. Their mere conclusion that the "interests of justice" would be served by the amendments is insufficient. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 610 (9th Cir. 1992). Therefore, the stipulation is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
