Sanchez v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00596-DMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181212946
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from December 10, 2018 to January 9, 2019. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has a
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from December 10, 2018 to January 9, 2019. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has a ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from December 10, 2018 to January 9, 2019. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has a Ninth Circuit opening brief due during the current week of the filing deadline, which requires multiple levels of review and an oral argument before the Ninth Circuit, which requires significant preparation and several moot courts. Counsel was out of the office on intermittent sick leave due to migraines and a personal family emergency. Due to Counsel's unexpected leave and heavy workload, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly JS For Extension of Time and PO Case No. 2:18-cv-00596-DMC respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
