Gstettenbauer v. City of Sacramento, 2:15-CV-00550-TLN-CKD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181212959
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING ALL DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff CYNTHIA GSTETTENBAUER nee CYNTHIA DE JESUS EDMUNSON and the CITY OF SACRAMENTO by and through their respective attorneys, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request the trial date and corresponding deadlines in this case be continued. Presently, trial in this case is scheduled to begin on September 23, 2019. This sixth request for an extension of time is based on the following go
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING ALL DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff CYNTHIA GSTETTENBAUER nee CYNTHIA DE JESUS EDMUNSON and the CITY OF SACRAMENTO by and through their respective attorneys, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request the trial date and corresponding deadlines in this case be continued. Presently, trial in this case is scheduled to begin on September 23, 2019. This sixth request for an extension of time is based on the following goo..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING ALL DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff CYNTHIA GSTETTENBAUER nee CYNTHIA DE JESUS EDMUNSON and the CITY OF SACRAMENTO by and through their respective attorneys, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request the trial date and corresponding deadlines in this case be continued. Presently, trial in this case is scheduled to begin on September 23, 2019. This sixth request for an extension of time is based on the following good cause:
1. The parties have reached a tentative settlement agreement, subject to approval by the City of Sacramento's City Council. The City anticipates this matter will be brought before its City Council in January 2019.
2. The parties believe the requested deadline extensions are necessary and appropriate given the parties tentative settlement agreement, which is pending City Council's approval.
Based on the forgoing, the parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court reset the deadlines as follows:
Expert disclosure: March 8, 2019
Expert rebuttal: April 8, 2019
Hearing of Dispositive Motions: July 2, 2019
Joint Pretrial Conference Statement: September 9, 2019
Pretrial conference: September 23, 2019
Trial: November 11, 2019
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation and the Court's calendar, the Court resets the deadlines as follows:
Expert disclosure: March 8, 2019
Expert rebuttal: April 8, 2019
Hearing of Dispositive Motions: July 11, 2019
Joint Pretrial Conference Statement: September 12, 2019
Pretrial conference: September 19, 2019 at 2:00 PM
Trial: November 18, 2019 at 9:00 AM
Source: Leagle
