Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mishra v. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corp., 2:17-cv-01785-TLN-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181212981 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT EXTENSION TO 31 PAGES TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Debi Mishra ("Plaintiff") ex parte requests a page limit extension for her Request for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement from the 20-page limit this Court imposes on dispositive motions to 31 pages. (ECF No. 18 at 2.) Plaintiff states "[t]he case has settled in principal. All settlement papers have been executed." (ECF No. 18 at 2.) Plaintiff states the
More

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT EXTENSION TO 31 PAGES

Plaintiff Debi Mishra ("Plaintiff") ex parte requests a page limit extension for her Request for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement from the 20-page limit this Court imposes on dispositive motions to 31 pages. (ECF No. 18 at 2.) Plaintiff states "[t]he case has settled in principal. All settlement papers have been executed." (ECF No. 18 at 2.) Plaintiff states the suit relies on the California Labor Code and the U.S. FLSA, notes settlements for collective actions for each are assed differently, and states the substantive text ran to 31 pages. (ECF No. 18 at 2.)

Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's request, (ECF No. 18), and Plaintiffs' Request for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement may contain 31 pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer