CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff filed this motion in order to avoid any question regarding timeliness. However, the motion itself indicates uncertainty about the amounts involved and explains why. The situation here is rather complicated. As a result of an earlier administrative law judge decision before this case reached this Court, plaintiff began receiving Supplemental Security Income payments. Following this Court's decision, remand, and a subsequent ALJ decision, plaintiff was found disabled as of the earlier date he had alleged. This entitles him to further, earlier SSI benefits and also to Disabled Adult Child Social Security benefits.
As of when plaintiff filed his attorney fee motion, first one notice and then another had issued regarding his DAC benefits, one based on his mother's earnings record and the other based on his father's. Only a few days ago, an SSI award notice issued. However, integration of all these differing amounts has not been performed by the agency, so the actual back benefit amount on which plaintiff's motion is predicated remains unknown.
Plaintiff will almost certainly have to file a slightly amended motion, modifying the amounts discussed and requested.
THE PARTIES STIPULATE that, with the Court's permission, proceedings on plaintiff's attorney fee motion be stayed until the agency calculates the integrated and combined benefit amount and plaintiff files an amended motion incorporating that new information.
SO STIPULATED.
For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested stay is granted. Plaintiff shall file an amended motion for attorney fees within 30 days of receiving the agency's notice determining plaintiff's actual past-due benefits.
SO ORDERED.