Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Wilhite, 2:18-cr-112 WBS. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181217719 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRESENTENCE SCHEDULE AND JUDGMENT & SENTENCING WILLIAM B. SHUBB , Senior District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Miriam Hinman, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Matthew C. Bockmon, counsel for Jeffery Wilhite, and J. Toney, counsel for Derek Hillgert, that the sentencing hearin
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRESENTENCE SCHEDULE AND JUDGMENT & SENTENCING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Miriam Hinman, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Matthew C. Bockmon, counsel for Jeffery Wilhite, and J. Toney, counsel for Derek Hillgert, that the sentencing hearing may be continued to February 25, 2019. Accordingly, it is further stipulated that the briefing schedule be continued as follows:

The Draft Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and disclosed to counsel no later than: 1/14/19 Informal Objections Due to Probation and Opposing Counsel no later than: 1/28/19 The Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and disclosed to counsel no later than: 2/4/19 Motion for Correction of the Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and served on the Probation Officer and opposing counsel no later than: 2/11/19 Reply or statement of non-opposition/Sentencing Memo: 2/19/19 Judgment and Sentencing Date: 2/25/19

This continuance is requested because defense counsel and Probation were not able to coordinate interviews of the defendants until recently and because defense counsel seeks additional time to investigate mitigating evidence in preparation for the sentencing hearing. Probation is aware of this stipulation and does not oppose the request. The government has no objection or opposition to the continuance.

ORDER

The Court, having received and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court orders the sentencing hearing reset for February 25, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer