Ricci v. County of Sacramento, 2:17-cv-02673-MCE-EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190104764
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Presently before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19), which is premised in part on the argument that this Court should abstain from hearing this case because a challenge to the underlying custody proceedings remains pending before California's Third District Court of Appeal. Based on this Court's review of the docket in that case, it appears those proceedings have terminated. Accordingly, not later than twenty (20) days f
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Presently before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19), which is premised in part on the argument that this Court should abstain from hearing this case because a challenge to the underlying custody proceedings remains pending before California's Third District Court of Appeal. Based on this Court's review of the docket in that case, it appears those proceedings have terminated. Accordingly, not later than twenty (20) days fo..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19), which is premised in part on the argument that this Court should abstain from hearing this case because a challenge to the underlying custody proceedings remains pending before California's Third District Court of Appeal. Based on this Court's review of the docket in that case, it appears those proceedings have terminated. Accordingly, not later than twenty (20) days following the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties are directed to file simultaneous briefing, not to exceed ten (10) pages per side, on how the termination of those proceedings impacts the case before this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
