Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Alvarado-Vasquez, 1:18-cr-00019-DAD-BAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190107475 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING; ORDER DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Spivak, counsel for plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Reed Grantham, counsel for defendant Francisco Alvarado-Vasquez, that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for January 9, 2019, be continued to February 4, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. On November 28, 2018, Probation filed its initi
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Spivak, counsel for plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Reed Grantham, counsel for defendant Francisco Alvarado-Vasquez, that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for January 9, 2019, be continued to February 4, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.

On November 28, 2018, Probation filed its initial Presentence Investigation Report ("PSR") in this case. Dkt. #41. Defense counsel submitted informal objections to the initial PSR, provided to Probation and the government on December 12, 2018. Dkt. 44-1 at 2-8. Following Probation's receipt of defense counsel's informal objections, a final PSR was filed with the Court on December 19, 2018. Dkt. #44. Defense counsel filed formal objections with the Court on December 26, 2018. Dkt. #45. On January 2, 2019, Probation provided both parties with a Dispositional Memorandum in this case, in reference to the accompanying probation violation in Case No. 1:17-cr-00303.

Both parties are requesting a brief continuance to further investigate information contained in Probation's Dispositional Memorandum, and to file respective sentencing memoranda responding to the Dispositional Memorandum. Additionally, both parties request additional time to file sentencing memoranda addressing information relevant for sentencing purposes not contained within Probation's PSR or Dispositional Memorandum. The requested continuance is made at the request of the parties, is for the parties' convenience, and is made with the intention of conserving time and resources for both the parties and the Court. The requested date is a mutually agreeable date for both parties. As this is a sentencing hearing, no exclusion of time is necessary.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sentencing hearing set for Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd be continued to Monday, February 4, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., as will the dispositional hearing in Case No. 1:17cr00303.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer