Ramirez v. Hoover Treated Wood Products, Inc., 1:17-CV-01545-JLT. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190107490
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS CASE (Doc. 22) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . JOINT STIPULATION COME NOW the parties jointly stipulate as follows: The parties have achieved a written settlement agreement, which is now fully executed and binding. Pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement this action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys'
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS CASE (Doc. 22) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . JOINT STIPULATION COME NOW the parties jointly stipulate as follows: The parties have achieved a written settlement agreement, which is now fully executed and binding. Pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement this action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' f..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS CASE
(Doc. 22)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
JOINT STIPULATION
COME NOW the parties jointly stipulate as follows:
The parties have achieved a written settlement agreement, which is now fully executed and binding. Pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement this action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
