Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sekona v. Custino, 2:16-CV-0517-JAM-DMC-P. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190110904 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the court are: (1) plaintiff's motions for an extension of time to file responses to defendants' motions for summary judgment and to stay discovery (Docs. 86 and 89); and (2) defendants' motion to stay discovery (Doc. 83). Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 85) will be addressed separately. Good cause appeari
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are: (1) plaintiff's motions for an extension of time to file responses to defendants' motions for summary judgment and to stay discovery (Docs. 86 and 89); and (2) defendants' motion to stay discovery (Doc. 83). Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 85) will be addressed separately.

Good cause appearing therefor, plaintiff's motions for an extension of time are granted. Plaintiff's oppositions to defendants' motions for summary judgment and to stay discovery, filed as a single pleading on January 2, 2019 (Doc. 90), are deemed timely.

Defendants seek an order staying discovery pending resolution of their motion for summary judgment based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Good cause appearing therefor, the request is granted. Discovery is stayed pending resolution of defendants' motion for summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer