Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Brummett, 2:18-cr-250-CKD. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190110921 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESET STATUS CONFERENCE CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties through their respective counsel, Special Assistant United States Attorney ERIC J. CHANG, Assistant Federal Defender LINDA C. ALLISON attorney for JULIEANN BRUMMETT, that the Court vacate the current status conference hearing set for January 10, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. and set a new status conference hearing for January 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. The parties anticipate
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESET STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties through their respective counsel, Special Assistant United States Attorney ERIC J. CHANG, Assistant Federal Defender LINDA C. ALLISON attorney for JULIEANN BRUMMETT, that the Court vacate the current status conference hearing set for January 10, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. and set a new status conference hearing for January 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.

The parties anticipate resolving the case by January 22, 2018. The continuance is requested for availability of the parties and defense preparation. The parties agree that the above reasons constitute good cause for a continuance. The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, because defense counsel needs additional time for preparation and investigation. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4).

ORDER TO RESET STATUS CONFERENCE DATE

Finding good cause, the Court orders the current status conference hearing date be vacated and sets a new status conference hearing for January 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m., before the Hon. Carolyn Delaney; and, excludes time for the reasons set forth above. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the defendants' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) (Local Code T4).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer