U.S. ex rel. Markus v. Aerojet RocketDyne Holdings, Inc., 2:15-cv-02245-WBS-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190115b11
Visitors: 32
Filed: Jan. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . The Court, having reviewed and considered the Relator and Defendants' Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. (hereinafter, "Defendants") Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint (the "Stipulation"), and good cause appearing
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . The Court, having reviewed and considered the Relator and Defendants' Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. (hereinafter, "Defendants") Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint (the "Stipulation"), and good cause appearing ..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
The Court, having reviewed and considered the Relator and Defendants' Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. (hereinafter, "Defendants") Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint (the "Stipulation"), and good cause appearing thereon, hereby grants the Stipulation to extend through and including February 22, 2019 Defendants' time to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
