Smith v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-0733-JLT. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190117f18
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC (Doc. 10) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for a thirty-day extension of time for Plaintiff to file an opening brief. (Doc. 10) The scheduling order permits a single extension of thirty days by stipulation, which has not been used by the parties. ( See Doc. 3 at 4) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of ti
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC (Doc. 10) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for a thirty-day extension of time for Plaintiff to file an opening brief. (Doc. 10) The scheduling order permits a single extension of thirty days by stipulation, which has not been used by the parties. ( See Doc. 3 at 4) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of tim..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC
(Doc. 10)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On January 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for a thirty-day extension of time for Plaintiff to file an opening brief. (Doc. 10) The scheduling order permits a single extension of thirty days by stipulation, which has not been used by the parties. (See Doc. 3 at 4) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time (Doc. 10) is granted nunc pro tunc; and
2. Plaintiff SHALL file an opening brief no later than February 11, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
