U.S. v. Stanley, 2:16-cr-0093 MCE. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190118677
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Presently before the Court is a letter (ECF No. 66) from Defendant seeking access to the discovery from his case. The Court referred this matter to the Office of the Federal Defender for response, and has since been advised (ECF No. 68) that all of the discovery was provided to Defendant's former counsel subject to a protective order prohibiting Defendant from being given control over that discovery, which contains highly sens
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Presently before the Court is a letter (ECF No. 66) from Defendant seeking access to the discovery from his case. The Court referred this matter to the Office of the Federal Defender for response, and has since been advised (ECF No. 68) that all of the discovery was provided to Defendant's former counsel subject to a protective order prohibiting Defendant from being given control over that discovery, which contains highly sensi..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Presently before the Court is a letter (ECF No. 66) from Defendant seeking access to the discovery from his case. The Court referred this matter to the Office of the Federal Defender for response, and has since been advised (ECF No. 68) that all of the discovery was provided to Defendant's former counsel subject to a protective order prohibiting Defendant from being given control over that discovery, which contains highly sensitive information pertaining to his victims. Defendant's request is thus DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
