Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McFadden v. Charles Schwab & Co., 2:18-cv-02193-MCE-DB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190122b25 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff JULIANNA MCFADDEN ("Plaintiff"), in Pro Se, and Defendant CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. ("Schwab"), by and through its counsel of record, that Schwab be dismissed from this action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Plaintiff does not wish to dismiss Defendant FIDELITY BROKERAGE SVS.
More

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff JULIANNA MCFADDEN ("Plaintiff"), in Pro Se, and Defendant CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. ("Schwab"), by and through its counsel of record, that Schwab be dismissed from this action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Plaintiff does not wish to dismiss Defendant FIDELITY BROKERAGE SVS. at this time.

IT IS HEREBY SO AGREED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, it is so ordered.1

FootNotes


1. In light of the parties' stipulation, defendant's November 27, 2018 motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 6) is denied without prejudice as having been rendered moot.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer