Clemens v. Union Pacific Railroad, 2:18: CV-00084 JAM AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190123992
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE. JOINT STIPULATION RE. FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation for Filing of First Amended Complaint for Damages, Plaintiff may file the proposed First Amended Complaint. Defendant Union Pacific Railroad's Answer on file is a sufficient response to the proposed First Amended Complaint or, in the alternative, Defendant may file and serve an amended Answer within two weeks of this Order. IT IS SO ORD
Summary: ORDER RE. JOINT STIPULATION RE. FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation for Filing of First Amended Complaint for Damages, Plaintiff may file the proposed First Amended Complaint. Defendant Union Pacific Railroad's Answer on file is a sufficient response to the proposed First Amended Complaint or, in the alternative, Defendant may file and serve an amended Answer within two weeks of this Order. IT IS SO ORDE..
More
ORDER RE. JOINT STIPULATION RE. FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation for Filing of First Amended Complaint for Damages, Plaintiff may file the proposed First Amended Complaint. Defendant Union Pacific Railroad's Answer on file is a sufficient response to the proposed First Amended Complaint or, in the alternative, Defendant may file and serve an amended Answer within two weeks of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
