Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. LaPant, 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190128564 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2019
Summary: FOURTH STIPULATION, MOTION, AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . On December 17, 2018 (ECF No. 99), Plaintiff United States of America and all of the defendants to this action ("Parties")—the United States of America and Roger J. LaPant, Jr., dba J&J Farms ("Mr. LaPant"), Goose Pond Ag, Inc., and Farmland Management Services (collectively, "Goose Pond Defendants")—presented the Court with a stipulation, motion, and proposed order to amend the schedule and impos
More

FOURTH STIPULATION, MOTION, AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULE

On December 17, 2018 (ECF No. 99), Plaintiff United States of America and all of the defendants to this action ("Parties")—the United States of America and Roger J. LaPant, Jr., dba J&J Farms ("Mr. LaPant"), Goose Pond Ag, Inc., and Farmland Management Services (collectively, "Goose Pond Defendants")—presented the Court with a stipulation, motion, and proposed order to amend the schedule and impose a partial stay of discovery. The reason for that stipulation was a proposed consent decree between the United States and the Goose Pond Defendants. To date, the Court has not entered the December 17, 2018 stipulation, motion, and proposed order presented by the Parties as ECF No. 99.

To date, the United States' motion for entry of the proposed decree remains pending. Additionally, as of midnight on December 21, 2018, funding for the Department of Justice expired and appropriations to the Department lapsed, and remains lapsed to date.

Given that the Court's review of the proposed consent decree remains pending and the ongoing lapse in appropriations, the parties hereby stipulate, move, and propose that the Court amend its November 26, 2018 Order (ECF No. 98) as set forth herein.

1. All remaining events should be rescheduled as follows:

Event Current Proposed All discovery completed February 15, 2019 May 16, 2019 Last day to hear dispositive April 5, 2019 July 19, 2019 motions Joint Pretrial Statement Due June 20, 2019 September 19, 2019 Motions in Limine To be set upon No change; to be set upon resolution of resolution of dispositive dispositive motions motions or at further or at further scheduling conference. scheduling conference. Final Pretrial Conference Same as above No change; same as above Trial Brief Same as above No change; same as above Jury Trial (Liability) Same as above No change; same as above Bench Trial (Remedy) Same as above No change; same as above

2. No depositions may be taken between now and April 8, 2019, and all such notices and/or subpoenas that have already been issued or are forthcoming, including but not limited to notices and/or subpoenas for expert witnesses, shall be held in abeyance pending efforts to meet and confer (as discussed in the sentence that follows).1 The Parties shall, no later than March 14, 2019, complete their meet and confer regarding depositions, including without limitation, the date and place for each event. Depositions may again be taken starting on April 9, 2019, and continue through and including May 16, 2019, and following the Parties' meet-and-confer referenced above, the Parties are permitted to serve additional deposition notices and/or subpoenas in accordance with the agreed-upon dates and places. Notwithstanding any other provision in this stipulation, any and all objections by or on behalf of the Parties or deponents to the notices or subpoenas described herein are reserved, and any and all unresolved objections shall be served in writing on or before March 21, 2019. Additionally, notwithstanding any other provision of this stipulation, the deadline for any motion to quash or motion for a protective order, whether filed by a Party or a deponent to the notices or subpoenas described herein shall be tolled while those notices or subpoenas are held in abeyance (as stated in the second sentence of this paragraph). The time for such motions shall be based upon the date for compliance as determined through the Parties' meet and confer described herein and at the availability of the Court.

3. From now until March 22, 2019, the Parties shall not: (a) propound or conduct any fact or expert discovery, written, oral, or otherwise, including but not limited to any depositions or any requests or subpoenas for documents, except as set forth in Paragraph 2 above and Paragraphs 4 through 6 below; or (b) conduct any law and motion practice, except for discovery motions as referenced in Paragraphs 4 through 6 below; motions to further amend the schedule; and motions for leave as referenced in Paragraph 6 below.

4. This stipulation, motion, and proposed Order does not prohibit the following discovery (and any related motion to compel or similar discovery motion) at any time:

a. Interrogatories solely between the United States and Mr. LaPant; b. Requests for admission solely between the United States and Mr. LaPant; c. Requests for documents solely between the United States and Mr. LaPant; and d. Subpoena for documents and electronically stored information from third parties, provided that the third party is not either affiliated with the Goose Pond Defendants (i.e. current employee or affiliated business entity), is not a former employee, retained expert, or confidential consultant, and the subpoena does not otherwise seek documents that contain information in the possession or control of the subpoenaed third party, which is asserted to be privileged or protected from disclosure by the Goose Pond Defendants.2

5. This stipulation, motion, and proposed Order does not otherwise affect the written discovery propounded discovery propounded by Mr. LaPant to date, including Mr. LaPant's Second Set of Interrogatories, Fourth Set of Request For Production of Documents, and First Set of Request For Admissions propounded on December 3, 2018 to the United States.

6. This stipulation, motion, and proposed Order does not prohibit the United States and Mr. LaPant from taking any action to address or resolve disputes regarding any outstanding discovery requests solely between themselves, including any pending discovery motions or matters currently the subject of discussion among the Parties.

7. The Parties reserve their right to seek leave of Court for any appropriate relief from or related to the restrictions on discovery set forth in this stipulation, motion, and proposed Order upon a showing of good cause. By the same token, the Parties reserve their right to oppose any request for relief.

STIPULATED AND RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

ORDER

Upon due consideration, and good cause shown, the Court approves the following:

Event Approved New Date All discovery completed May 16, 2019 Last day to hear dispositive motions July 19, 2019 Joint Pretrial Statement Due September 19, 2019 Motions in Limine No change; to be set upon resolution of dispositive motions or at further scheduling conference. Final Pretrial Conference No change; same as above Trial Brief No change; same as above Jury Trial (Liability) No change; same as above Bench Trial (Remedy) No change; same as above

FootNotes


1. The foregoing sentence in the body of this stipulation refers to the following deponents about which the United States and Mr. LaPant have initially conferred: Ken Lane, Matthew Kelley, Terry Cheney, James Komar, Todd LaPant, and Roger J. LaPant, Jr. Mr. LaPant has issued notices of deposition for Messrs. Kelley and Komar, and the United States intends to issue notices of deposition or subpoenas to the remaining deponents. In addition, the foregoing sentence in the body of this stipulation refers to the following retained experts for which Mr. LaPant has issued notices of deposition or subpoenas: Gregory House, Peter Stokely, Scott Stewart, Michael Josselyn, Randall Grip, Misha Schwarz, and Mark Hanna. Additionally, the foregoing sentence in the body of this stipulation refers to the following retained experts for which the United States may issue notices of deposition: Paul Wisniewski, Paul Squires, and Damon Brown. In addition, the foregoing sentence in the body of this stipulation refers to any additional deponents for which the Goose Pond Defendants may issue notices of deposition or subpoenas, including but not limited to retained experts.
2. To facilitate implementation of this provision, the Parties further agree that any party wishing to serve any additional deposition notices and/or subpoenas not served on opposing counsel prior to November 15, 2018, shall first provide seven days advance written notice to all other parties, prior to service of any such subpoena. No such subpoena may be served without leave of Court if the Goose Pond Defendants notify the other parties in writing, within the seven day period, that the proposed subpoena is directed to a party that is either affiliated with the Goose Pond Defendants (i.e. current employee or affiliated business entity), or is a former employee, retained expert, or confidential consultant, or the subpoena otherwise seeks documents that contain information in the possession or control of the subpoenaed third party, which is asserted to be privileged or protected from disclosure by the Goose Pond Defendants.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer