Filed: Jan. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . On December 7, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 60), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 60.) No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207 , 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's co
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . On December 7, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 60), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 60.) No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207 , 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's con..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
On December 7, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 60), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 60.) No objections were filed.
Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 60) are ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff's motion to amend the second amended complaint (ECF No. 51) is DENIED.
