Flores v. City of California City, 1:18-CV-00703 DAD-JLT. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190129781
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 28 DAYS (Doc. 29) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Good cause appearing, the Court grants the stipulation to extend the time for defendants CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, FRANK GARCIA HUIZAR and STEVEN GEOFFREY WHITING to file a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint, up to and including February 15, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 28 DAYS (Doc. 29)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
Good cause appearing, the Court grants the stipulation to extend the time for defendants CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, FRANK GARCIA HUIZAR and STEVEN GEOFFREY WHITING to file a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint, up to and including February 15, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
