Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brown v. County of Mariposa, 1:18-cv-01541-LJO-SAB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190129799 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2019
Summary: AMENDED ORDER VACATING ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE STATUS REPORT AND CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES (ECF Nos. 13, 14) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On November 7, 2018, Jeffrey Brown ("Plaintiff") filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against the County of Mariposa, Doug Binnewies, Cody Hart, Sean Land and the John C. Fremont Healthcare District. On January 17, 2019, an order issued requiring Plaintiff to file a report on t
More

AMENDED ORDER VACATING ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE STATUS REPORT AND CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES (ECF Nos. 13, 14)

On November 7, 2018, Jeffrey Brown ("Plaintiff") filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the County of Mariposa, Doug Binnewies, Cody Hart, Sean Land and the John C. Fremont Healthcare District. On January 17, 2019, an order issued requiring Plaintiff to file a report on the status of this action and Plaintiff filed a stipulation to continue the scheduling conference.1

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, Defendants have until January 29, 2019 to file a responsive pleading and they seek to continue the scheduling conference in this matter until March 5, 2019.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The order requiring Plaintiff to file a status report is VACATED; 2. Defendants' responsive pleading shall be filed on or before January 29, 2019; 3. The scheduling conference set for January 29, 2019, is CONTINUED to March 5, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 9; and 4. The parties shall file a joint status report seven (7) days prior to the scheduling conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. On January 17, 2019, the Court issued an order addressing the parties' stipulation to extend time to file a responsive pleading which contained an error. This amended order issues to correct that date that the responsive pleading is due.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer