Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Judson v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc., 1:18-cv-01405-DAD-EPG. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190201793 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY CASE AND DEFER ALL DEADLINES PENDING MOTION TO TRANSFER ACTIONS TO THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1407 FOR COORDINATED OR CONSOLIDATED PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs, John Judson and Jo Ann Hamel, and Defendants, Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. ("Prinston"), Solco Healthcare U.S., LLC ("Solco"), Huahai U.S., Inc. ("Huahai"), and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. ("Teva") (collectively, "Defendants"), 1 by a
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY CASE AND DEFER ALL DEADLINES PENDING MOTION TO TRANSFER ACTIONS TO THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1407 FOR COORDINATED OR CONSOLIDATED PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiffs, John Judson and Jo Ann Hamel, and Defendants, Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. ("Prinston"), Solco Healthcare U.S., LLC ("Solco"), Huahai U.S., Inc. ("Huahai"), and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. ("Teva") (collectively, "Defendants"),1 by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request that this Court stay all deadlines in this case pending a ruling by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") on Plaintiff Robert Kruk's Motion to Transfer Actions to the District of New Jersey Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in In re: Valsartan N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 2875 (J.P.M.L. Oct. 22, 2018):

1. Plaintiff's Complaint was filed on October 11, 2018.

2. This case is one of at least eighteen putative federal class action lawsuits involving the medication Valsartan.

3. On October 22, 2018, Plaintiff in Kruk v. Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., et al., No. 18-cv-005944 (N.D. Ill.) filed in the JPML a Motion to Transfer Actions to the District of New Jersey Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 for Coordinated or Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings. See In re: Valsartan N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 2875 (J.P.M.L. Oct. 22, 2018) (the "Motion to Transfer," attached as Exhibit A).2

4. Plaintiff in the Kruk action seeks an order from the JPML transferring NDMA-related Valsartan litigation to the District of New Jersey, including this case, and consolidating those cases or coordinating their pretrial proceedings pursuant to § 1407(a).

5. In the interest of judicial economy, and to avoid the risk of inconsistent pretrial rulings, duplicative discovery obligations, inconsistent or overlapping class certification rulings, and to promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation, the Parties wish to stay this case pending a ruling from the JPML on the Motion to Transfer.

6. The JPML is scheduled to hold a hearing on the Motion to Transfer on January 31, 2019.3 As such, a stay pending the JPML's ruling would be limited, would last for a brief, definite period, and will not result in undue prejudice to any of the Parties.

7. Plaintiffs and all served Defendants consent to this request, and no party will be prejudiced by a stay of the case.

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, through their attorneys of record, request this Court stay this case and defer all deadlines. A proposed order is attached to this Motion.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the stipulation of Plaintiffs, John Judson and Jo Ann Hamel, and Defendants, Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc., Solco Healthcare U.S., LLC, Huahai U.S., Inc., and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The stipulated request is granted;

2. All deadlines are VACATED until further order of Court;

3. This action is STAYED pending the ruling by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on the Motion to Transfer Actions to the District of New Jersey Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in In re: Valsartan N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 2875 (J.P.M.L. Oct. 22, 2018); and

4. The Parties shall file a status report within seven days of the JPML's ruling, apprising the Court of the JPML's decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. To the best of Defendants' knowledge, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. has not been served and does not participate in this Stipulation.
2. This Court has also received notice of the Motion to Transfer. See ECF No. 7.
3. See Notice of Hearing Session, Exhibit B.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer